"youre old enough to make appointments yourself now"

image

Reblogged from Ruined Childhood

awomanfromitaly:

claydols:

its weird that guys get so touchy when you accuse them of sexism like “im not sexist wtf????” when they should really be worried about “ive been acting sexist wtf????” like dude youre not the victim of an accusation the accusation is the result of your behavior

literally every person born into a position to oppress has behaved like this and its gross

shouldn’t the natural reaction to any accusation be, “No I’m not.”?

jonhny:

Breaking Bad,[3/5] Colours: Red.

jonhny:

Breaking Bad,
[3/5] Colours: Red.

Reblogged from I am the danger.
Reblogged from Ruined Childhood
Reblogged from Ruined Childhood
logicd:

the-benaissance-man:

gavelbanginsara:

zomanian:

spankmethorin:

radgreymon:

rudegirlqueer:

sarcasticxfantastic:

socialismartnature:

Rape, By The Numbers.

everyone needs to see this graphic

Boost.

crazy

I linked this to my guy friends who always use the excuse of “What about the false reports? It’s not fair that innocent men are accused of a crime they didn’t commit”
2 out of 1000. 0.02% Of all rapes are false.

YOU HAVE NO IDEA HOW MAD I AM RIGHT NOW.

That math is wrong. 2/1000=0.2%

This whole thing is wrong.  
The “falsely accused” should be in the “reported” category”, as it is a subset. Of the “reported but not accused”, and “faced trial but not jailed”, at least some of those should also be included in the “falsely accused” group. This is like the recent problem in my stats class, where 200 adults were surveyed, and 110 drank coffee, 50 drank tea, and 90 drank cola.  The key is that there’s overlap in the groups, and this chart doesn’t represent that. 
Claiming that huge number as the number of rapists is purely speculation.  If only so many are reported, then what supports the claim that there are something like eight times that number that actually happen? 
The overall design of the chart is bad.  Since the category represented uses two units, and all other categories are divisible by two, it visually inflates the numbers, where a more accurate representation would show smaller groups.  Not factually wrong, but it plays off people’s perceptions, and show that the purpose of this is emotional influence rather than objective reporting. 


http://i.imgur.com/6JNyYOl.jpg
Also, though the debunking states the false claims to be from 2-8%, there are a lot of studies showing it to be anywhere from 2-28%
>378,000 notes
leave it to tumblr to spread false bullshit while actual factual posts get little to no notes

logicd:

the-benaissance-man:

gavelbanginsara:

zomanian:

spankmethorin:

radgreymon:

rudegirlqueer:

sarcasticxfantastic:

socialismartnature:

Rape, By The Numbers.

everyone needs to see this graphic

Boost.

crazy

I linked this to my guy friends who always use the excuse of “What about the false reports? It’s not fair that innocent men are accused of a crime they didn’t commit”

2 out of 1000. 0.02% Of all rapes are false.

YOU HAVE NO IDEA HOW MAD I AM RIGHT NOW.

That math is wrong. 2/1000=0.2%

This whole thing is wrong.  

  1. The “falsely accused” should be in the “reported” category”, as it is a subset. Of the “reported but not accused”, and “faced trial but not jailed”, at least some of those should also be included in the “falsely accused” group. 

    This is like the recent problem in my stats class, where 200 adults were surveyed, and 110 drank coffee, 50 drank tea, and 90 drank cola.  The key is that there’s overlap in the groups, and this chart doesn’t represent that. 

  2. Claiming that huge number as the number of rapists is purely speculation.  If only so many are reported, then what supports the claim that there are something like eight times that number that actually happen? 

  3. The overall design of the chart is bad.  Since the category represented uses two units, and all other categories are divisible by two, it visually inflates the numbers, where a more accurate representation would show smaller groups.  Not factually wrong, but it plays off people’s perceptions, and show that the purpose of this is emotional influence rather than objective reporting. 

http://i.imgur.com/6JNyYOl.jpg

Also, though the debunking states the false claims to be from 2-8%, there are a lot of studies showing it to be anywhere from 2-28%

>378,000 notes

leave it to tumblr to spread false bullshit while actual factual posts get little to no notes

Reblogged from You just got logic'd

kristoffbjorgman:

this is the only frozen-related gifset you’ll ever need

lumoblaze:

cyrilthewolf:

deerfriend:

when will it end


The ride is never ogre

Our great ogrelord can’t be stopped

lumoblaze:

cyrilthewolf:

deerfriend:

when will it end

The ride is never ogre

Our great ogrelord can’t be stopped

Reblogged from Hi.

Paul Newman and Joanne Woodward by Lawrence Schiller, Los Angeles 1967

Reblogged from Esther Mao
Reblogged from Ruined Childhood

guiltyhipster:

The joke’s on both of you

You end up dating each other 

Reblogged from Ruined Childhood

i-am-of-asgard:

This actually makes sense

your move america 

fairyofoz:

Look at her! *______*

Reblogged from indomitable